Re:FBI Reopens Clinton E-Mail Probe Less Than Two Weeks Befo...
by heurist on Friday October 28, 2016 @04:49PM
(#12820542)
That's pretty presumptive. The last FBI investigation into her emails went a year and found nothing. Given that she's been running for president the last decade or two and republicans will pounce on her over any little misstep, do you really think she'd intentionally do something that could ruin her chances of winning or staying president? Remember that intention is important in law...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:FBI Reopens Clinton E-Mail Probe Less Than Two Weeks Befo...
by cmdrfred on Friday October 28, 2016 @05:44PM
(#12821020)
>The last FBI investigation into her emails went a year and found nothing.
Incorrect, they found no one who was "willing to prosecute"
Re:FBI Reopens Clinton E-Mail Probe Less Than Two Weeks Befo...
by heurist on Friday October 28, 2016 @07:12PM
(#12821570)
So they found effectively nothing, which is all they'll find here.
Re:FBI Reopens Clinton E-Mail Probe Less Than Two Weeks Befo...
by cmdrfred on Friday October 28, 2016 @09:29PM
(#12822125)
Or nobody was willing to commit political suicide and bring her to justice.
Re:FBI Reopens Clinton E-Mail Probe Less Than Two Weeks Befo...
by heurist on Monday October 31, 2016 @06:08PM
(#12841394)
I'm sure there are thousands of republicans chomping at the bit to do just that...
Re:FBI Reopens Clinton E-Mail Probe Less Than Two Weeks Befo...
by gragas on Friday October 28, 2016 @06:28PM
(#12821315)
These are independent events. Investigating for a year, handing out a bunch of immunity agreements and finding yourself out of people to prosecute says nothing about the new evidence at hand.
Re:FBI Reopens Clinton E-Mail Probe Less Than Two Weeks Befo...
by vectorpush on Friday October 28, 2016 @07:22PM
(#12821615)
In what way is what I said presumptive?