News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uber drivers win employee rights case by lgieron on Friday October 28, 2016 @10:40AM (#12816338)
In the UK (and also in, for example, Poland) self-employed people pay much lower taxes than the employees - hence we're all very happy to trade away our rights.
Re:Uber drivers win employee rights case by rwmj on Friday October 28, 2016 @11:55AM (#12817340)
I believe you are thinking of people who set up companies and pay themselves through dividends (which have a much lower tax rate), which is now (highly controversially) illegal -- search for "IR35".

Ordinary self-employed people and sole traders pay nearly the same tax rates as employed people (National Insurance, a strange disguised tax, is at a different rate), but have many fewer rights, eg. no right to paid time off or sick pay.

The question in this case is whether Uber drivers are self-employed or not. Not as it turns out.

Re:Uber drivers win employee rights case by nvarsj on Friday October 28, 2016 @06:55PM (#12821461)
> pay themselves through dividends (which have a much lower tax rate), which is now (highly controversially) illegal

What on earth are you talking about... taking out dividends is not illegal, even for individual company owners. IR35 is about HMRC forcing self employed people to apply payroll taxes as if they were employed. Again, nothing to do with dividends.

Re:Uber drivers win employee rights case by gaius on Friday October 28, 2016 @10:57AM (#12816500)
But that has a social impact. You might be chuckling to yourself over how much NI you're not paying, but if you are injured the NHS will still treat you, and the money has to come from somewhere.
Re:Uber drivers win employee rights case by infinite8s on Friday October 28, 2016 @11:14AM (#12816710)
That's interesting, in the US it is the opposite, although you might be able to write off certain things as expenses so your overall taxable income is lower.