Ask HN: Is Bash for Windows good enough to replace a Linux/Mac terminal?

Re:Ask HN: Is Bash for Windows good enough to replace a Linu... by LifeQuestioner on Friday October 28, 2016 @06:34AM (#12814579)

The VM's are amazing.

You don't have to dual boot.

You can have on one screen Ubuntu, on the other, windows. So you can use all your photoshoppy design programs on windows and the best coding on linux.

Best of both worlds.

You can also intall cygwin in windows which gives you a terminal on windows. Although there may be be a better program now than cygwin

Also, not sure if this is any good: http://www.pcworld.com/article/3106463/windows/how-to-get-ba...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ask HN: Is Bash for Windows good enough to replace a Linu... by ars_nihili on Friday October 28, 2016 @06:36AM (#12814589)

> You can also intall cygwin in windows which gives you a terminal on windows. Although there may be be a better program now than cygwin

Yes, like WSL, which OP is asking.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ask HN: Is Bash for Windows good enough to replace a Linu... by LifeQuestioner on Friday October 28, 2016 @06:56AM (#12814673)

Nothing wrong with broadening an answer, no need to be black and white. Cygwin has been around for ages.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ask HN: Is Bash for Windows good enough to replace a Linu... by bitcrazed on Friday October 28, 2016 @09:56PM (#12822206)

There's a big difference between Cygwin and Bash on Windows though: Cygwin is a Win32 port of the GNU tools, whereas Bash on Windows is a Linux kernel emulation layer that allows you to run unmodified Linux binaries directly on Windows.

[ Parent | on HN ]