Re:Richard Stallman: "I Wished I Had Killed Myself"
by _delirium on Tuesday April 20, 2010 @09:39PM
(#1281144)
I'm not sure that's true, though it's a counterfactual so hard to prove either way. I think without Wintel, probably we would've had more competition and innovation in the area, and cheaper/faster machines. There was plenty of speeding up and broadening of home-computer access before Wintel came on the scene, with competition between Amiga, Atari, Apple, etc. And even in Wintel, innovation sped up noticeably once AMD managed to temporarily break Intel's stranglehold, and inject a bit of competition into the x86 market.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Richard Stallman: "I Wished I Had Killed Myself"
by wisty on Wednesday April 21, 2010 @02:22AM
(#1281514)
Keep in mind, it was Wintel that locked us into a single CPU platform. Otherwise we'd be on ARM by now.
Re:Richard Stallman: "I Wished I Had Killed Myself"
by _b8r0 on Wednesday April 21, 2010 @05:28AM
(#1281716)
Not so in China: http://lemote.kd85.com/
And indeed, looking forward: http://www.tomshardware.com/news/ARM-Atom-Netbooks,7242.html
Re:Richard Stallman: "I Wished I Had Killed Myself"
by chbarts on Wednesday April 21, 2010 @07:02AM
(#1281822)
> I think without Wintel, probably we would've had more competition and innovation in the area, and cheaper/faster machines.
Maybe. Or maybe we'd just have locked on to CP/M-86 and Digital Research, which was just as tied to x86.
However, it's impossible to tell if someone like Gates would have risen to the top. Gary Kildall was not Bill Gates and, for that reason among others, Digital Research never became Microsoft. Corporate culture and philosophies matter.