News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:MacBook Pro by rayiner on Thursday October 27, 2016 @02:55PM (#12808352)
How many of those desktops are used in corporate environments that would never spring for a machine that starts at $2,999?
Re:MacBook Pro by pcwalton on Thursday October 27, 2016 @03:04PM (#12808517)
I don't know? I'm interested in correcting your hyperbolic statement, not in "which computer will sell better to IT departments" predictions.
Re:MacBook Pro by devopsproject on Thursday October 27, 2016 @03:05PM (#12808536)
This isn't a computer for excel\word\facebook.

The target market for this is people who buy a $1,800 wacom cintiq and pair it with a $1,000 computer.

The price is reasonable for the people it targets.

Re:MacBook Pro by Mtinie on Thursday October 27, 2016 @03:57PM (#12809236)
Slight correction, though your point stands. You would need to buy the $2,800, 27" Cintiq[1] and a new computer to compete against the Surface Studio offering. This makes the Surface Studio a more compelling offering on the surface, at least to me.

[1]https://us-store.wacom.com/Catalog/Pen-Displays/Cintiq/Cinti...

Re:MacBook Pro by wlesieutre on Thursday October 27, 2016 @04:12PM (#12809441)
Penny Arcade's Mike Krahulik has been using one for a week and compared it to his Cintiq:

> Tycho asked me to compare it to my Cintiq, and I told him that drawing on the Cintiq now felt like drawing on a piece of dirty plexiglass hovering over a CRT monitor from 1997.

A bit hyperbolic, but you get the idea. https://www.penny-arcade.com/news/post/2016/10/26/the-surfac...

Re:MacBook Pro by jljljl on Thursday October 27, 2016 @03:48PM (#12809111)
Honest Question: How does the actual computing hardware on the entry level Surface Studio compare to a $1000 computer?
Re:MacBook Pro by devopsproject on Thursday October 27, 2016 @04:01PM (#12809290)
Not an exhaustive search: http://store.hp.com/us/en/pdp/business-solutions/hp-z240-tow...

So for 1,100 you are getting half as much ram, half as much storage, and a lesser gpu.

I'm sure you could spec out something similar to the internals for a few hundred less with a little bit of work.

Re:MacBook Pro by NetStrikeForce on Thursday October 27, 2016 @04:03PM (#12809328)
Comparing it to an Apple computer maybe?
Re:MacBook Pro by rodgerd on Thursday October 27, 2016 @03:06PM (#12808541)
It's kind of amusing watching Apple fans replay "spec" and "niche" arguments they used to poo-poo. Kind of like watching them do a smooth about-face on the superiority of PowerPC processors back in the day.
Re:MacBook Pro by pimeys on Friday October 28, 2016 @03:25AM (#12813770)
I've been running a custom desktop PC at work for years. I tend to want the best possible hardware and getting a custom workstation is the cheapest way of getting it. Very happy with my machine and I've never had any need for a laptop in the office.