News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:MacBook Pro by karmelapple on Thursday October 27, 2016 @02:48PM (#12808207)
And the wild thing is, the ports introduced today aren't even USB-C; they're Thunderbolt 3 ports.

Thunderbolt 3 and USB-C are not the same, right?

Re:MacBook Pro by artimaeis on Thursday October 27, 2016 @02:54PM (#12808336)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thunderbolt_(interface)#Thunde...

Thunderbolt 3 is basically an extension which builds on top of USB-C. As such it's fully backwards compatible.

Re:MacBook Pro by potatolicious on Thursday October 27, 2016 @02:50PM (#12808245)
No, but the ports are dual-mode. Plug a USB-C thing into it and it's a USB port. Plug a Thunderbolt device in and it's a Thunderbolt port.

Similar to the dual-mode mini-DP/Thunderbolt ports of the past.

The ports introduced today absolutely are USB-C.

Re:MacBook Pro by anonymfus on Thursday October 27, 2016 @04:22PM (#12809590)
If all USB ports on machine are also thunderbolt ports, it looks like a security problem.
Re:MacBook Pro by morinted on Thursday October 27, 2016 @02:51PM (#12808276)
From what I understand, they are merged. Meaning that USB C and Thunderbolt 3 are compatible, but you will get more throughput when you are TB3 to TB3 than when mixing with USB C (I may be off!)
Re:MacBook Pro by masklinn on Thursday October 27, 2016 @03:26PM (#12808826)
* USB-C is the physical port, TB3 uses USB-C

* TB3 is an alternate mode of USB, if you have TB3 you have USB[0]

* The reverse is not true, you can have non-TB3 USB-only ports

[0] well technically not necessarily, the USB-C and USB-3.1 standards are completely separated but that'd be really stupid