Re:Snapchat Seeks to Raise as Much as $4B in IPO
by CN7R on Wednesday October 26, 2016 @05:00PM
(#12800497)
IMO, Google glasses were an obtrusive form of eyewear with limited AR capabilities—with a price tag of $1500. Spectacles are $130.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Snapchat Seeks to Raise as Much as $4B in IPO
by adamnemecek on Wednesday October 26, 2016 @05:07PM
(#12800566)
You are right they are quite a bit cheaper but they are just as obtrusive. I think that glasses (esp. dioptric) are fundamentally a part of your identity and I think that most people fundamentally hate associating themselves with a company not to come across as a 'fanboys'. Like wearing the snapchat glasses projects a certain type of persona which I think most people might prefer not to project.
I think that they should be marketed as "cool glasses (that also record video)" as opposed to "video recording glasses". "Video recording glasses" are a gimmick, "cool glasses (that also record video)" could be timeless.
Re:Snapchat Seeks to Raise as Much as $4B in IPO
by nateburke on Wednesday October 26, 2016 @10:28PM
(#12802486)
My initial impression upon seeing the spectacles was that they had two cameras. They don't, but the impression points to a key design choice that was, IMHO, fatally absent from Google glass: attempted symmetry.
I think that people will be more likely to wear the spectacles for this reason--they can actually pass for a pair of somewhat ostentatious sunglasses to an unknowing observer because of their near-symmetry, vs. Google glass, the mere shape of which screamed "BORG!"