"wealthy individual donors and small businesses, along with drug policy advocacy groups, have funneled far more dollars to the opposition than casinos..." That seems a bit disingenuous when it goes on to say in the next sentence "Las Vegas casino magnate Sheldon Adelson is singlehandedly responsible for roughly one-third of all anti-legalization spending this year, a total of $3.5 million in three states so far." I understand that at a basic level, these are private individual donations, instead of donations from some lobbying group, but when that individual is designated a "casino magnate", does it even matter?