News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Woman Gives Her Autistic 9-Year-Old Marijuana by tokenadult on Tuesday April 20, 2010 @12:41PM (#1279879)
The US doesn't allow medical trials on marijuana. It doesn't allow research on marijuana.

Since I have found a contrary statement, in a publication that I would expect to tell me the truth on this issue,

http://hightimes.com/news/ht_admin/295

"DEA OKs MEDICAL-MARIJUANA TRIALS

"Tue, Jun 11, 2002 12:00 am

"Peter Gorman WASHINGTON After nearly 20 years of refusing to approve a single medical-marijuana human research trial, the Drug Enforcement Administration has simultaneously approved three individual trials. All three patient trials will involve the use of smoked marijuana, and be conducted at the University of California's Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research (CMCR), at its San Diego and San Francisco campuses. The marijuana used will be supplied by the National Institute on Drug Abuse's (NIDA) federally approved Hattiesburg, Mississippi pot farm."

I would expect you to back up that statement if you want us to believe it.

I see from the expected Google Scholar search

http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=marijuana trials

that marijuana clinical trials are going on somewhere, so if there is demonstrable medical benefit from taking marijuana that is not available from some other drug, the scientific community will eventually hear about it.

Re:Woman Gives Her Autistic 9-Year-Old Marijuana by roc on Tuesday April 20, 2010 @01:24PM (#1280008)
There's one huge caveat to that:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/19/health/policy/19marijuana....

[If] a researcher wants to use a variety of marijuana that the University of Mississippi does not grow -- and there are many with differing medicinal properties -- they are out of luck, Dr. Doblin said.

"As the National Institute on Drug Abuse, our focus is primarily on the negative consequences of marijuana use," said Shirley Simson, a spokeswoman for the drug abuse institute, known as NIDA. "We generally do not fund research focused on the potential beneficial medical effects of marijuana."

NIDA controls the supply, the strains available and the research on a proposal-by-proposal basis. They admit that their first priority is not accurate science, via their active discriminating against research into beneficial effects.

While I'm not going to declare all the research they've allowed is necessarily bad, it's clearly limited and incomplete to a dysfunctional degree.

Re:Woman Gives Her Autistic 9-Year-Old Marijuana by Alex3917 on Tuesday April 20, 2010 @01:05PM (#1279953)
In 1996 there were 250 academic journal articles published about marijuana, and in 2008 there were 2100[1]. In the US there are a handful of marijuana trials going on, but it's still very difficult to get DEA approval. I was at the MAPS conference this past weekend, and they were saying that to get approval for their psilocybin and MDMA research it was generally taking 2-4 years per study. And since marijuana is also schedule 1, the approval process is probably comparable.

[1]Source: Claudia Little in Psychedelic Salon podcast 218: http://bit.ly/doBrGA.

Re:Woman Gives Her Autistic 9-Year-Old Marijuana by r0s on Tuesday April 20, 2010 @04:00PM (#1280442)
It's completely at the whim of the DEA, that's not legal permission it's selective enforcement. Any minute political shift could land the researchers in jail, all their assets personal or otherwise seized until trial.

This non action is the opposite of leadership, and the Department of Justice taking a slightly less conservative stance on the issue isn't progress.

Re:Woman Gives Her Autistic 9-Year-Old Marijuana by r0s on Thursday April 22, 2010 @03:12PM (#1286143)
Testing line feeds/n Line feeds!<br>

wtf line feeds

as;ldjfsa;jf