News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:White House urges ban on non-compete agreements for many ... by cmdrfred on Wednesday October 26, 2016 @10:39AM (#12796775)
That might work. If I wanted to put an employee under a non-compete the easiest way seems to offer something in return. Something along the lines of: "...Employee shall not work for any competitor during his employment and 6 months thereafter, as such he will receive a one time payment of 10,000 dollars...". I think the main issue here is employers want this service for free.
Re:White House urges ban on non-compete agreements for many ... by GeneralMayhem on Wednesday October 26, 2016 @11:46AM (#12797429)
I'd consider even $10,000 insulting in the Bay Area - that's 1 month salary in return for having control over them for 6 months.
Re:White House urges ban on non-compete agreements for many ... by cmdrfred on Wednesday October 26, 2016 @01:19PM (#12798412)
The key is that number is negotiable. If it was low and static that agreement won't be enforceable.