News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Perl 6 is different by dkarl on Tuesday April 20, 2010 @11:27AM (#1279643)
especially after trying to add a few grammar-modifying CPAN modules

How do modules compose with respect to syntax? I remember encountering a big frustration in Common Lisp when I used two libraries that depended on defining '[' as a reader macro for pretty syntax. Whichever library I allowed to use the '[' reader macro, my usage of the other library became verbose and hard to read.

Not to mention that neither altering a module's source nor depending on the sequence of module loading is scalable across many modules.

Re:Why Perl 6 is different by riffraff on Tuesday April 20, 2010 @01:39PM (#1280068)
they are lexically scoped, so as a non expert, I guess they are closer to scheme than to CL