News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:We Got Phished by acdha on Monday October 24, 2016 @08:18PM (#12784096)
Your browser connects to Google and tells the U2F token to auth using the www.google.com key: works

Your browser connects to [email protected] but no matter whether you believe that site to be Google, the U2F process means that it can only use a key for phish.me, which won't work on the Google.com servers even if they relay it.

The only attack which still works is if they control DNS and can forge an SSL certificate, at which point we have much bigger problems than phishing.

Re:We Got Phished by oarsinsync on Tuesday October 25, 2016 @07:48AM (#12787066)
> The only attack which still works is if they control DNS and can forge an SSL certificate

Or if they're able to get some malware onto your system permitting them to change your dns servers or alter your hosts file, and add certificates to your OS/browser trust store.

Re:We Got Phished by acdha on Tuesday October 25, 2016 @10:24AM (#12788224)
Both of those fall into “control of DNS” or “forging an SSL certificate”. Besides, if they can do either of those things they don't need to phish you because they can just hijaack your existing browser when you login to the real site.
Re:We Got Phished by Kadin on Tuesday October 25, 2016 @10:27AM (#12788256)
Sure, but that's raising the bar a hell of a lot higher than where it is currently, where all you need is a HTML email message that happens to superficially resemble something a random person might expect Google to send.

And in the long run I have more faith in making systems more secure via technological means than to try and convince users not to click on links in shady email messages. So by moving the problem into the technology domain and out of the social domain, I'd say it's a big win.