News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Font Awesome 5 by knowuh on Monday October 24, 2016 @02:03PM (#12781182)
I just wanted to plug Icomoon ( https://icomoon.io/ ) -- They will let you assemble your own custom font icon set using subsets of public glyphs such as FA, and your own SVG images. I Hope this helps someone.
Re:Font Awesome 5 by brookside on Monday October 24, 2016 @02:43PM (#12781581)
I use icomoon and it is definitely helpful but I must say the UX for creating icon sets is quite scary to use. Clicking on an icon by default removes or adds it to the icon set, so its incredibly easy to exclude an icon you are using already (meaning next time you publish your font, that icon will no longer render on your page)
Re:Font Awesome 5 by kumaraman on Monday October 24, 2016 @03:40PM (#12782109)
Yeah, I've done this countless times, only realising once I have packaged it into my project. I ended up creating a Webpack loader which takes a small JSON file and creates an icon set for my project. I could consider releasing it on Github if there is interest in something like this?
Re:Font Awesome 5 by grawlinson on Monday October 24, 2016 @05:59PM (#12783275)
That would be awesome, I'd definitely be interested in having a look.
Re:Font Awesome 5 by vmasto on Monday October 24, 2016 @05:59PM (#12783276)
Absolutely!
Re:Font Awesome 5 by TenJack on Monday October 24, 2016 @02:57PM (#12781724)
I use Icomoon extensively, it works great.
Re:Font Awesome 5 by irrational on Monday October 24, 2016 @07:44PM (#12783921)
I usually use icomoon as well. Are there any benefits to font awesome over icomoon?
Re:Font Awesome 5 by dexterdog on Monday October 24, 2016 @09:43PM (#12784575)
One is that there is a much better chance that your user is going to have the font pack already cached.
Re:Font Awesome 5 by irrational on Monday October 24, 2016 @11:11PM (#12784977)
Do people actually include the entire font? I usually just grab the few svg icons I need and include those.
Re:Font Awesome 5 by dexterdog on Tuesday October 25, 2016 @05:28PM (#12791793)
For FA? I would expect so. It' much easier to just link to the whole package for most people.