Re:Static typing will not save us from broken software
by tome on Sunday October 23, 2016 @03:32PM
(#12775029)
> As static typing becomes more elaborate the scope of the bugs it can prevent becomes wider, but it usually comes with an additional cost: Build times.
This is the meat of the entire argument, and it's false, as you can verify by running ghc with the -fno-code option. Type checking is extremely fast. It's everything else that's slow and that has absolutely nothing to do with static typing.
This is the meat of the entire argument, and it's false, as you can verify by running ghc with the -fno-code option. Type checking is extremely fast. It's everything else that's slow and that has absolutely nothing to do with static typing.