News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on NPM v4.0.0. Parent comment

Re:NPM v4.0.0 by coldtea on Sunday October 23, 2016 @08:48AM (#12773336)
>I went to DuckDuckGo to check out what yarn is.

And DuckDuckGo (mentioned twice in the comment) is relevant because?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:NPM v4.0.0 by raindev on Sunday October 23, 2016 @09:10AM (#12773401)
Because DuckDuckGo's index of the yarn's website could be screwed or out of date. Also, because people communicate using language, not axioms.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:NPM v4.0.0 by coldtea on Sunday October 23, 2016 @01:13PM (#12774359)
>Because DuckDuckGo's index of the yarn's website could be screwed or out of date.

And why should we know about DDG's index info about Yarn?

Just visit Yarn's actual project site (which is what you're supposed to be criticizing), and focus your critique on what's actually there now.

>Also, because people communicate using language, not axioms.

So? How does that justify adding off-topic/redundant information on one's critique?

[ Parent | on HN ]