News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:PayPal 2FA Bypass by pluma on Sunday October 23, 2016 @07:41AM (#12773094)
I'm guessing it's five characters so people don't just use their four digit PIN. I don't have any explanation for why they would limit it to five characters though, or why it has to be alphanumeric.

That said, Comdirect seems to offer regular passwords or six digit PINs and Bank of Scotland (in Germany) seems to also offer regular passwords.

But there are plenty of other offenders. For example my energy provider E-wie-einfach requires a mix of alphanumeric characters but forbids pasting and autofill (the latter of which luckily Chrome simply ignores).

I don't know what idiot ever came up with the idea that disabling paste makes logins more secure (only justification I've ever heard was about preventing brute force attacks, proving an utter lack of understanding of the technology involved) but sadly it's still a thing and it still leads to people using trivial and easy to type passwords.

Re:PayPal 2FA Bypass by tttttttttttt on Sunday October 23, 2016 @03:35PM (#12775041)
The justification is a rootkit which intercepts copy-paste but not the password field
Re:PayPal 2FA Bypass by pluma on Monday October 24, 2016 @05:49AM (#12777620)
Sure, except then it would intercept the copy, not the paste. And it basically trades clipboard vulnerabilities for keylogging vulnerabilities.

A more realistic exploit is a Flash banner on another tab intercepting the password in the clipboard. This is why offline password managers automatically expire the clipboard though.

The danger of discouraging complex or long passwords is far greater than either of these two attacks, both of which rely on the user's system already being compromised.