News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A New Real-Estate War in Silicon Valley by twblalock on Saturday October 22, 2016 @05:30PM (#12770660)
It's not just that. Actually, most rent control policies allow new or unoccupied units to be rented out at the market rate.

The problem is that the legal increase in rents is generally capped, so if the tenants who move in today remain in the rental units for many years, eventually they will be paying far below market rate.

On the other hand, the cost of insurance, maintenance, etc. for the landlord will continue to increase at the market rate, so the landlord's profit on rent will continually shrink and may become negative. That's obviously going to make developing new rental properties less attractive.

Re:A New Real-Estate War in Silicon Valley by spoonie on Monday October 24, 2016 @09:57AM (#12778792)
Why are the landlord's costs going up "at the market rate" (which we will assume is higher than inflation)? Because the plumber lives in a market rent apartment and has to charge twice as much as a few years ago? Why would their insurance costs go up that fast? It's not like their property taxes are going up that fast. ;)

I believe the arguments that rent control is distortionary and poorly targeted (maybe they should make it means-tested rent control! I'm sure that won't have any effect on poorer people trying to rent! :P). But I don't see how market-rate rent increases, that happen fast enough for people to reach for rent control, are because the landlords are maintaining the same margins and seeing their costs increase. I do get the opportunity costs and reduced resale value costs though.