Re:Xz format inadequate for long-term archiving
by jl6 on Saturday October 22, 2016 @01:28PM
(#12769585)
Doesn't one typically write to tape drives with tar, rather than writing a raw file?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Xz format inadequate for long-term archiving
by LukeShu on Saturday October 22, 2016 @01:44PM
(#12769667)
Indeed. This is why the tar format explicitly allows garbage data at the end. So then people started pondering all of the nifty or clever things they could do with tar files. And they didn't want to give it up when they started compressing the tar files.
Re:Xz format inadequate for long-term archiving
by zeta0134 on Sunday October 23, 2016 @12:57AM
(#12772037)
Couldn't you just reverse the order then, and create an xz.tar? Maybe I don't understand the benefit of taring the data first.
Re:Xz format inadequate for long-term archiving
by wojcech on Sunday October 23, 2016 @06:52AM
(#12772954)
Tar is just bundling into a single file AFAIK. There is a slight benefit depending on your compression tool to tar and then compress, because (AFAIK again)some tools compress files individually and then write them into a hierarchical file(I guess this is what xz does as well, since it's searchable?). If you tar first, these tools will work better, since they encode patterns found in all files instead if doing it per file(which means e.g. if there is a header once per file, that will get compressed in the tar.comorpress, not in the . compress)