News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Colonizing Mars: A Critique of the SpaceX Interplanetary ... by maxerickson on Friday October 21, 2016 @10:45PM (#12766808)
Risks are relative. is a very different calculation than People have lived in zero g for a year at a time, without significant health impact.
Re:Colonizing Mars: A Critique of the SpaceX Interplanetary ... by marze on Saturday October 22, 2016 @12:37AM (#12767207)
Different, but both true.

If you have a 5% of dying in transit or at Mars due to equipment failure, as well as a 2% increased chance of getting cancer at some time in the future, the first obviously is the one to worry about.

Re:Colonizing Mars: A Critique of the SpaceX Interplanetary ... by M_Grey on Saturday October 22, 2016 @02:35PM (#12769931)
It's going to be dangerous enough on Mars, without adding those factors in. Worse, it's going to be difficult if the person who dies is in a critical position. You would have some redundancy in personnel, but that's costly in terms of Delta-v too, for them, and for everything it takes to keep them alive.