News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Elm 1+2: can't download X. Parent comment

Re:Elm 1+2: can't download X by tsneed290 on Thursday October 20, 2016 @01:13PM (#12754151)
Most likely lazy-loading libraries
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Elm 1+2: can't download X by problems on Thursday October 20, 2016 @01:14PM (#12754170)
Libraries for adding numbers, apparently?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Elm 1+2: can't download X by Skinney on Thursday October 20, 2016 @01:36PM (#12754360)
+ is specified in the core library, so yeah.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Elm 1+2: can't download X by axihack on Thursday October 20, 2016 @01:29PM (#12754298)
Yep, lazy-loading core libraries.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Elm 1+2: can't download X by monodeldiablo on Thursday October 20, 2016 @02:59PM (#12755133)
Naive question: How does Elm manage to bootstrap a complex thing like a REPL without using basic functions like '+'?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Elm 1+2: can't download X by cuddlybacon on Thursday October 20, 2016 @04:56PM (#12756092)
The REPL is written in Haskell.

Elm doesn't target native or node.js yet.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Elm 1+2: can't download X by daddykotex on Thursday October 20, 2016 @02:52PM (#12755073)
Ok thanks!
[ Parent | on HN ]