News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:CacheP2P – Distributed caching platform by ComodoHacker on Thursday October 20, 2016 @12:05PM (#12753524)
Sounds cool, but what are the use-cases? What problems is this tech trying to solve?
Re:CacheP2P – Distributed caching platform by WhoBeI on Thursday October 20, 2016 @01:26PM (#12754277)
I have the same issue - can't think of a single one. Most of the ones I could think of are solved better with CDN or other cloud services.

Well, should all DNS servers suddenly die it might be useful but besides that..

But, yeah, still kind of cool.

Re:CacheP2P – Distributed caching platform by deckar01 on Thursday October 20, 2016 @01:42PM (#12754406)
CDNs and cloud services cost money to setup and maintain.

This scales asset availability with popularity, automatically, for free, with minimal setup.

Re:CacheP2P – Distributed caching platform by guerrerocarlos on Friday October 21, 2016 @06:05PM (#12765307)
You resumed it brilliantly, I took the liberty to cite you in the landing page, hope you don't mind.
Re:CacheP2P – Distributed caching platform by deckar01 on Sunday October 23, 2016 @12:33PM (#12774191)
Happy to help. Thanks for working on this awesome project!
Re:CacheP2P – Distributed caching platform by Senji on Thursday October 20, 2016 @06:36PM (#12756790)
Slashdot/Reddit hug of death? Infinitely scalable content delivery on the backs of your site visitors' upload bandwidth.
Re:CacheP2P – Distributed caching platform by kukkukb on Friday October 21, 2016 @04:59AM (#12759090)
Would this help against DDoS attacks on a web site?
Re:CacheP2P – Distributed caching platform by ComodoHacker on Friday October 21, 2016 @07:58AM (#12759645)
No if its content is dynamic.
Re:CacheP2P – Distributed caching platform by c3833174 on Thursday October 20, 2016 @12:10PM (#12753575)
Saving some bandwidth costs?
Re:CacheP2P – Distributed caching platform by ComodoHacker on Friday October 21, 2016 @02:17AM (#12758504)
You mean transfer this cost to site visitors?