> I don't want hackers in our election machines or running smear campaigns targeted on one candidate.

Those two things are not comparable. Hacking election machines to actually change the vote is not what is happening. People are finding information and releasing it. So in your view the Billy Bush tape should have been suppressed? Should all negative campaign ads be stopped? Should MSNBC and FOX news be taken off the air for a period before the election?

It's a slippery slope we head down when talking about not having information released.

So you would rather that all people (not just you) have less information for making a a massive decision that will influence the future of the country for 4 years?

Americans had all the information they needed with Hillary's voting record and Trump's business record plus their prior behavior toward America in general and individual human beings. I filtered them out early based on these things in favor of early candidates who actually did things that benefited their constituents with less damaging corruption. What people do vs what they say, how they dress, whatever superficial crap. It's my radical theory on getting better politicians. That people care what professional liars with damaging, track records are promising them is the problem.

That's they've both openly mocked and might fight many key freedoms I have from speech to search/seizure to due process means I'm certainly not putting either in control of FBI, DHS, IRS, DOD, etc. I'm voting for whoever is left on the ballot besides them in protest. I don't need to know anything more about them. I'm barely watching the election debates as they're just embarrassing.

Well said. In that we can agree.