News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ecuador acknowledges it has "temporarily restricted" Assa... by beezle on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @05:52AM (#12742426)
To;dr if press did job no need for wikileaks

Funny how its OK until its all to close to a preferred interest is Clinton or the nebulous "us election process'

Perhaps if the us media did their jobs reporting on this stuff then there wouldn't be all this drama. Though if anyone has tried to influence election it is the "press" who likewise sit on stories - trump pussy tape, bush DUI as just two examples.

That same hypothetically unbiased press is quite good at playing team red or blue cheerleader directly or indirectly by access to like minded travelers. And let's not forget the bipolar ignore/bash any and all minor party candidates.

As to sourcing of material who cares? Its the facts revealed that matter. This is not some whispered in the ear dark of night off the record hit job.

Re:Ecuador acknowledges it has "temporarily restricted" Assa... by spinchange on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @07:12AM (#12742746)
>To;dr if press did job no need for wikileaks

Yeah the Guardian and New York Times really missed the boat not hacking John Podesta's email so we could learn how to make the perfect risotto. Or doxxing thousands of innocent Turkish citizens in a cache of "Government emails" that wasn't Government emails at all but hundreds of thousand of public forum posts, less than three hundred of which had government addresses. Transparency is important and good. Good, hard hitting journalism is more vital and necessary than ever. Julian Assange and Wikileaks are not journalists and not filling any civic void, just Assange's megalomaniacal need for attention as an information broker of other people's secrets.

Re:Ecuador acknowledges it has "temporarily restricted" Assa... by mvf0 on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @11:37AM (#12744719)
Your head is in the sand if you think risotto is the only thing revealed by the Podesta leaks.
Re:Ecuador acknowledges it has "temporarily restricted" Assa... by spinchange on Thursday October 20, 2016 @04:13PM (#12755717)
I haven't read them all (there are thousands) but the emails I have read are mostly benign and reveal things about her and her team that perhaps while embarrassing or even impolitic, are hardly criminal.
Re:Ecuador acknowledges it has "temporarily restricted" Assa... by mvf0 on Friday October 21, 2016 @12:20PM (#12761697)
Top Clinton aide Doug Band signals his concern over Bill Clinton's conflicts of interest

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/21978

“I signed a conflict of interest policy as a board member of cgi ... Oddly, wjc does not have to sign such a document even though he is personally paid by 3 cgi sponsors, gets many expensive gifts from them, some that are at home etc.”

Do you think conflicts of interest at the highest peaks of federal government are "benign" and "hardly criminal"? This is just one example of really shady stuff revealed in the leaks. IMO the Clinton Foundation sells political influence and that's illegal.

Re:Ecuador acknowledges it has "temporarily restricted" Assa... by Spooky23 on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @08:51AM (#12743273)
The sourcing is a problem because the titulating nature of the sourcing becomes the story instead of whatever the story is.

The revelations in the Podesta emails has been pretty lame. There's not a lot of surprises, but lots of chaff that will create some personally embarrassing moments for people.