News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:On the wikileak-ed emails from Tanden on Lessig by harry8 on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @02:12AM (#12741495)
Context for the remainder so you can know they aren't cherry-picked and your reading of whatever you get out of any of them is through your own bias alone and not Assange's, the NYT editorial team's or whoever else. You only need to trust that Assange will publish you don't have to care what he thinks about anything else.
Re:On the wikileak-ed emails from Tanden on Lessig by tedunangst on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @06:25AM (#12742561)
This would be more convincing if Assange wasn't always talking up the next batch, the contingency files, etc. Not only is he withholding publication, but he's bragging about it, which really does make it hard to believe he's just passing everything along.
Re:On the wikileak-ed emails from Tanden on Lessig by harry8 on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @07:35AM (#12742869)
ok so your problem is as a publisher he shouldn't promote his publication. And he by doing so he's withholding publication of something unspecified that we can't know about.

I'll disagree with that and get on with life.