News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Background on Attempts to Frame Assange as a Pedophile an... by makomk on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @05:40PM (#12738982)
They're coming on thick and strong with attempts to discredit the source because the source is seriously lacking in credibility. I'd already spotted and commented on the bizarre UN shenanigans earlier: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12737648 The fact that the sole source is a dating company press release in which they claim to be a United Nations signatory and member, and that they accuse the UN of conspiring with Assange and the Bahamas police, should've been enough justification not to take everything as gospel. Unfortunately, Daily Kos are keen to attack Assange and not so keen on fact checking and research, as are Mrs Clinton's Twitter supporters.
Re:Background on Attempts to Frame Assange as a Pedophile an... by cryoshon on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @07:31PM (#12739670)
>They're coming on thick and strong with attempts to discredit the source because the source is seriously lacking in credibility

the way they could do this correctly is to contradict assange's claims with evidence... do that, and if their evidence is valid, assange's claims collapse.

but they aren't doing that; they can't do that.

here is the recipe upcoming from the clinton campaign:

1. attack source

2. escalate attacks on source

3. deny claims of source categorically

4. deny context of facts that source puts forth

5. deny specifics of facts that source puts forth

6. deny involvement of high level people

7. throw scapegoats

8. deny witting involvement of high level people

9. admit item numbers 3 through 8, sequentially, as separate steps

10. media "loses attention" of the story before reaching the point where high level people admit that the allegations of the source are correct

this cycle will take a while, maybe a year or so.

Re:Background on Attempts to Frame Assange as a Pedophile an... by rosser on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @05:52PM (#12739054)
There's a material difference between questioning a sources's credibility and trying to discredit it.
Re:Background on Attempts to Frame Assange as a Pedophile an... by imron on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @08:26PM (#12739936)
I agree with you completely. My comment was written after discussing this elsewhere on the internet where the context was that people are trying to discredit wikileaks and Assange as a source. I've edited my post to reflect that.