Mercurial 4.0 Sprint Notes

Re:Mercurial 4.0 Sprint Notes by shoover on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @04:33PM (#12738386)

Hmm. I haven't looked at RhodeCode. For me Kiln has provided a good UI and workflow and just worked ever since their v2.4 or so. I'm not sure there is a particular best feature, but roughly these features are what come to mind:

- Code review UI including comment pane with one level of sub-threading and easy click and drag linking to lines of code, small changeset selection pane, and large scrolling code pane are simple and work well. By contrast, I'm less sure about github and bitbucket pull requests UI.

- largefiles

- Single sign-on and linking with FogBugz (if we reference a FogBugz case in a commit message, then the commits show up in the case notes)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Mercurial 4.0 Sprint Notes by marcinkuzminski on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @04:44PM (#12738501)

Thanks for sharing, actually those two first ones was our main focus from beginning.

We worked back in the days with Unity which was using kiln to make the code-review workflows similar.

If you miss kiln, you should check RhodeCode out, and our community edition is even open-sourced.

[ Parent | on HN ]