News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ecuador Says It Still Backs Assange, but WikiLeaks Says I... by fixermark on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @01:37PM (#12736847)
The condensed version is "There are some issues so contentious that negotiation by committee does not work."

Imagine trying to end WWII if every citizen of every nation in that war were sitting at the negotiating table.

Re:Ecuador Says It Still Backs Assange, but WikiLeaks Says I... by dogma1138 on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @01:52PM (#12736974)
WWII ended with unconditional surrender IIRC.

A good modern example would be the middle east peace process, every time there are negotiations and a deal is on the table it blows up more often than not because of premature and selective release of information.

The selective part doesn't have to be intentionally i.e. in one side only releasing part of the information but simply because the other points were not settled upon yet.

Negotiations are like trying to balance an egg on a point of a needle, if they aren't they are often one sided.