News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Shame on Y Combinator by pron on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @09:15AM (#12734010)
> he represents a group of people who haven't been represented for the last 40 years.

http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/10/15/13286498/d...

> the fundamental principle that no matter what in a democracy everyone have the right to say and mean what they want without having to fear the repercussions

This is not a principle, let alone a fundamental one, in any democracy or any other kind of society.

Re:Shame on Y Combinator by dlss on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @09:24AM (#12734077)
> > the fundamental principle that no matter what in a democracy everyone have the right to say and mean what they want without having to fear the repercussions

> This is not a principle, let alone a fundamental one, in any democracy or any other kind of society.

While this is literally true, I feel the need to point out that increased restrictions on speech, and increased repercussions for speech seem to correlate strongly with non-democracies.

Re:Shame on Y Combinator by tptacek on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @09:42AM (#12734197)
Exposure to criticism is not a "restriction on speech".
Re:Shame on Y Combinator by Senji on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @12:33PM (#12736118)
Agitating for people to be fired based on pilitical affiliation is not "criticizm". If you think it is consider how you would feel about it when you are on tbe receiving end.
Re:Shame on Y Combinator by makomk on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @10:23AM (#12734588)
Read this: https://baselinescenario.com/2016/10/17/you-cant-get-there-f...

The very same Gallup study which that Vox article relied on to argue that Trump support was correlated with higher, not lower income also found that blue collar and less educated workers were disproportionately likely to vote for Trump, and Vox intentionally omitted that fact. This is particularly dishonest of Vox because the result they did quote was after correcting for the fact that working-class status and education are correlated with income, and they didn't mention that either.

That is, any correlation with income that appeared to be better explained by both being correlated with being working-class or anything else was excluded, and worse still there's no guarantee that the attribution to a particular category (say, class instead of income) is the result of anything other than random chance.

Re:Shame on Y Combinator by pron on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @10:41AM (#12734832)
Very interesting. I actually read this as a more nuanced take on the Vox article (which I'd read more as saying "it's not economic anxiety" rather than "it's this other thing than economic anxiety"). The verdict seems to be, we cannot tell whether it's economic anxiety or something else. Anyway, interesting blog, which I've now added to my subscriptions, so thanks for that!