Re:Wikileaks: Julian Assange's internet access 'cut'
by dharma1 on Monday October 17, 2016 @01:30PM
(#12727137)
The Guardian one is slightly better. I don't think there is real evidence, and Assange isn't so stupid as to publicly say he supports Trump (even if he does, for whatever reason).
But if there is no agenda, it does make one wonder why the Wikileaks of late have focused on Clinton in the run up to the election
Re:Wikileaks: Julian Assange's internet access 'cut'
by cwkoss on Monday October 17, 2016 @03:06PM
(#12728205)
Occams Razor says that they've only received credible leaks about the HRC campaign.
Seems to me like anyone with credible evidence against Trump can sell it to the highest bidding mainstream media org and be sure it will get national attention. Why would a Trump leaker need wikileaks?
>Sarah Harrison, a British journalist and a longtime WikiLeaks editor, says that the organization would publish documents damaging to Trump if it had them.
The bloomberg article also quoted someone from reddit as evidence that the right wing was 'shivering in anticipation' of leaks damaging to clinton. It's not great journalism and seems biased but it doesn't seem there is any evidence that assange is pro trump.