Re:Wikileaks: Julian Assange's internet access 'cut'
by malz on Monday October 17, 2016 @12:15PM
(#12726402)
I don't know about the embassy but I enjoy the non-ironic claim that "The ambassador has not yet responded to emails."
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Wikileaks: Julian Assange's internet access 'cut'
by mikeash on Monday October 17, 2016 @12:23PM
(#12726507)
The whole story was prompted by a non-ironic tweet that their internet was cut off, so it fits.
Re:Wikileaks: Julian Assange's internet access 'cut'
by chvid on Monday October 17, 2016 @01:07PM
(#12726904)
As the embassy is in the middle of London why can't anyone (a journalist maybe) pop by and see what is going on? Or maybe just call by phone?
Re:Wikileaks: Julian Assange's internet access 'cut'
by wbhart on Monday October 17, 2016 @01:21PM
(#12727058)
The actual article states that the BBC tried to contact the embassy by phone, but the staff there are not authorised to comment. They have thus far been unable to raise the ambassador by email. People have been down there by foot, and there is apparently nothing to see.
Re:Wikileaks: Julian Assange's internet access 'cut'
by rurban on Monday October 17, 2016 @06:59PM
(#12730602)
Catch 22. People showed up at the embassy clerk today, but they told them you need a prior appointment with Julian. Which is only possible via internet. So nada.
Re:Wikileaks: Julian Assange's internet access 'cut'
by jacquesm on Monday October 17, 2016 @12:54PM
(#12726779)
That tweet could have been in response to a dead-mans switch being activated.