News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Chipotle Eats Itself by rdtsc on Sunday October 16, 2016 @11:16PM (#12722476)
> Yet Chipotle has had no choice but to grapple with the reality that its prestige status has evaporated.

That's the key. It lost at its supposed top mission to - provide wholesome food with healthy ingredients, not like those other cheap / dirty fast food places.

Yes Tesla had an issue, Dole did. Tesla is new, its mission is to make really cool cars. Dole's is selling food, but its mission is to provide bulks processed foods, which a large majority of people wouldn't honestly claim is healthy or wholesome.

I can't explain but, yes, I lost the desire to eat there. I know rationally it doesn't make sense. But we have walked too many times past a Chipotle we used to go to and said "meh maybe next time". Next time never comes somehow.

Re:Chipotle Eats Itself by jessaustin on Sunday October 16, 2016 @11:31PM (#12722536)
I have such good memories of Chipotle from a decade ago and earlier. I'm in a rural area recently so I hadn't been to one in some time. The last time I went to one (after their troubles; I figured my odds weren't too bad), I was surprised at how dirty the restaurant was and how rude the staff was (without my even mentioning the former condition). If Chipotle's prices were like Taco Bell's I could tolerate those conditions, but given their expense I won't be back. After all most Taco Bells are clean and polite, and one generally can tell which ones won't be before walking in.
Re:Chipotle Eats Itself by SyneRyder on Monday October 17, 2016 @02:30AM (#12723038)
> given their expense I won't be back

I wonder if that's part of the company's problem, that the E-Coli incident just gave people a reason to rethink their habits? I used to eat a lot at a similar burrito restaurant in Australia, but something happened to make me realize I was paying twice as much for a meal there than I would at Subway, and for all the burrito restaurant's "healthy food" claims I was starting to put on weight, so I stopped eating there.

Re:Chipotle Eats Itself by GarrisonPrime on Monday October 17, 2016 @03:55AM (#12723329)
The awkward price is why I, my family, my friends, my coworkers, and everyone else I know basically stopped going there.

Why wait in a slow line, pay a premium price, and spend twice as long to chow on a burrito or bowl as it would take you to eat a burger or taco? Sure the food is good, but the hassle is just a bit much. If I wanted to put up with all of that I prefer to just spend a few bucks more and go to a proper restaurant.

Re:Chipotle Eats Itself by nerdponx on Monday October 17, 2016 @08:27AM (#12724398)
The price is double that of the burger because the quality of the food is also a double that of a burger.

I never noticed how good chipotles ingredients were until I started eating bowls instead of burritos. Those massive burritos are a sloppy tube of undifferentiated food matter that totally obscures the quality of the food.

Personally I think they should institute a "small size" burrito, for a lower price. Moe's does this.

Re:Chipotle Eats Itself by GarrisonPrime on Monday October 17, 2016 @11:57PM (#12731941)
Yeah, the quality is double. I'm not saying the price isn't worth it. I'm saying the price is in an awkward point. They're competing with both fast food and restaurants.
Re:Chipotle Eats Itself by twoodfin on Monday October 17, 2016 @09:41AM (#12724859)
Personally I think they should institute a "small size" burrito, for a lower price. Moe's does this.

I'd like that, but I can see why they don't. I doubt the savings on ingredients would be adequate for them to preserve their margins yet offer a price point that would seem reasonable to the consumer. Very few would be interested if it were only (say) 15 cents cheaper.

Re:Chipotle Eats Itself by nerdponx on Monday October 24, 2016 @08:33PM (#12784205)
The smaller size at Moes is at least a dollar cheaper, or at least it was when I went there last
Re:Chipotle Eats Itself by smrtinsert on Monday October 17, 2016 @01:21AM (#12722835)
Maybe it was the fact that a single burrito was worth 1000 calories. You knew it was already bad for you. To see it potentially harbor disease was somewhat of a tipping point for a lot of customers I think.