Re:Walmart Paid Its People More to Get Cleaner Stores and Hi...
by winstonewert on Saturday October 15, 2016 @12:44PM
(#12714614)
1) Given that there are fewer jobs available, and more people seeking those jobs, its simply absurd to think that people are just going to get better at getting those jobs to make up for it.
2) Whether the company is turning or a profit or paying a high salary is completely irreleavent. The question is whether or not you are productive enough that hiring you makes the company more money then they pay you.
Re:Walmart Paid Its People More to Get Cleaner Stores and Hi...
by adventured on Saturday October 15, 2016 @01:52PM
(#12714947)
There aren't fewer jobs available. US full-time job openings are at/near all-time highs and have been for a while now.
Re:Walmart Paid Its People More to Get Cleaner Stores and Hi...
by winstonewert on Saturday October 15, 2016 @02:53PM
(#12715189)
Sure. But I was specifically speaking about these higher-paying jobs at Wal-Mart. The fewer jobs at Wal-Mart are more then offset by increased jobs elsewhere.
"increase in productivity will be insufficient to cover the increase of wages" is only true if the company isn't turning a profit or paying high salary to managers. This is relevant for some small businesses and bankruptcy-threatened large business, but not for the largest players in the economy, like Walmart.