News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Nuclear Pulse Propulsion – Orion and Beyond (2000) [pdf] by Symmetry on Friday October 14, 2016 @08:29AM (#12707617)
I think I like the recent work on pulsed fission-fusion better. Basically you have a normal z-pinch fusion system but surround the fusing hydrogen with U238. It absorbs the fast neutrons from the fusion, fissions, and creates more heat driving the fusion. There's some radioactive waste flying out the nozzle but if you're already in space that's not a huge problem.

On the upside, people aren't going to get nervous about nuclear weapons in space since you can't trigger the fuel pellets outside the engine. And you don't need a massive pusher plate, you just direct the charged plasma with magnetic fields. And that means you can wait to turn this on until you're in orbit and avoid creating any fallout on Earth.

https://www.nasa.gov/content/pulsed-fission-fusion-puff-prop...

Re:Nuclear Pulse Propulsion – Orion and Beyond (2000) [pdf] by maverick_iceman on Friday October 14, 2016 @11:18AM (#12708644)
What's the Isp of this method?
Re:Nuclear Pulse Propulsion – Orion and Beyond (2000) [pdf] by Symmetry on Friday October 14, 2016 @11:48AM (#12708875)
The first paper mentions 19,400 seconds at one point; versus 450 for hydrolox and 3100 for Dawn's ion drive. I did a blog posts on the theoretical limit on this sort of drive a while ago, using propellant velocity instead of ISP.

http://hopefullyintersting.blogspot.com/2015/04/rockets-vi-v...