News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Canonical releases Ubuntu 16.10 by gcp on Thursday October 13, 2016 @10:53AM (#12701119)
Current Kubuntu with Plasma is anything but lightweight.

There's really lightweight alternatives like Lubuntu and Xubuntu. You can give them a spin in a VM. If Linux for you mostly means a browser window and a few terminals, they'll do fine.

Re:Canonical releases Ubuntu 16.10 by noir_lord on Thursday October 13, 2016 @11:58AM (#12701637)
That undersells Xubuntu which is a full DE and very similar to GNOME 2, if you just want a classic stays out the way desktop then Xububtu is excellent.
Re:Canonical releases Ubuntu 16.10 by Zardoz84 on Thursday October 13, 2016 @12:16PM (#12701806)
Common! Stop these old black legend about KDE being heavy weight! I saw it running soft and fast even without 2d/3d acceleration!
Re:Canonical releases Ubuntu 16.10 by Sylos on Thursday October 13, 2016 @02:19PM (#12702853)
To be fair, in comparison to most other DEs, it is still rather heavyweight. Definitely more heavyweight than LXDE and Xfce, and Unity is pretty well-optimised at this point, too.

But yeah, for what KDE is capable off, especially in comparison to GNOME or the Windows-world, it's actually incredibly lightweight.

I run it on a 4 year old mid-range laptop with 4 GB of RAM, Intel HD Graphics 4000, and as long as my system isn't under heavy load, it's buttery smooth, even with many of the bells and whistles enabled.

Re:Canonical releases Ubuntu 16.10 by allendoerfer on Thursday October 13, 2016 @04:05PM (#12703608)
> I run it on a 4 year old mid-range laptop with 4 GB of RAM, Intel HD Graphics 4000, and as long as my system isn't under heavy load, it's buttery smooth, even with many of the bells and whistles enabled.

It is a desktop environment, not a 3D game. It should ALWAYS be buttery smooth. You can run a desktop environment on a 20 year old machine.

Re:Canonical releases Ubuntu 16.10 by skykooler on Thursday October 13, 2016 @03:16PM (#12703276)
I used to run Kubuntu (with KDE 4) on an old Yakumo laptop, with 384 megs of RAM and a 600 MHz Celeron. Ran very smoothly. Coudn't have more than 2 apps open at a time, though. (And even that was sometimes pushing it.)
Re:Canonical releases Ubuntu 16.10 by seba_dos1 on Thursday October 13, 2016 @01:07PM (#12702276)
I don't know what they do, but Kubuntu does seem to be a bit heavy compared to Plasma 5 on other distributions. I seem to recall KDE devs calling out Kubuntu for its poor KDE integration.
Re:Canonical releases Ubuntu 16.10 by gcp on Thursday October 13, 2016 @01:36PM (#12702538)
Tell me, why do I need TWO kwallet daemons?

Why do I need to disable a filesystem indexer by default that slows the system to a crawl?

Re:Canonical releases Ubuntu 16.10 by Sylos on Thursday October 13, 2016 @01:53PM (#12702660)
> Why do I need to disable a filesystem indexer by default that slows the system to a crawl?

As far as I'm aware, that's considered a thing of the past. I haven't seen it recommended for any recent version anywhere and at least for me, it runs perfectly fine without disabling it.

I also only have one kwallet daemon running right now.

That's on Plasma 5.8.

Re:Canonical releases Ubuntu 16.10 by gcp on Thursday October 13, 2016 @02:17PM (#12702831)
I think Ubuntu 16.04 is on Plasma 5.7 or older. (That's where I experienced this).
Re:Canonical releases Ubuntu 16.10 by reitanqild on Thursday October 13, 2016 @02:28PM (#12702926)
My rule of thumb: don't use Kubuntu, use some other KDE distro ( used to be mandrake/mandriva, now possible OpenSuse or Arch or something, I don't follow it too closely ATM.)