News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Netflix Now Only Has 31 Movies from IMDB's Top 250 List by oldmanjay on Wednesday October 12, 2016 @04:05PM (#12696034)
That's not really a flaw of netflix, is it? If you believe it is, I'd love to understand your reasoning.
Re:Netflix Now Only Has 31 Movies from IMDB's Top 250 List by wtetzner on Wednesday October 12, 2016 @04:39PM (#12696271)
I'm not the OP, but I'll give it a shot :)

The value Netflix provides is primarily convenience. There are other ways to watch movies and TV shows, the reason to use Netflix is that it's more convenient than the alternatives.

Having to deal with physical media (and wait for them to be delivered) is less convenient than other alternatives to Netflix. Therefore, it's a flaw of Netflix.

Re:Netflix Now Only Has 31 Movies from IMDB's Top 250 List by pmoriarty on Wednesday October 12, 2016 @05:21PM (#12696510)
Streaming is definitely more convenient, but since Netflix's streaming selection is atrocious, it's not worth my time or money.

I'd much rather put up with the minimal hassle and a bit of a wait to get a great selection of DVDs.

The "hassle" amounts to me opening up an envelope, putting the DVD in to my DVD player, putting it back in to the envelope when I'm done and throwing it in to a mailbox on my way to work.

Sure, it's not as easy as hitting play in a streaming app, but not really a big deal, either.

Re:Netflix Now Only Has 31 Movies from IMDB's Top 250 List by phamilton on Wednesday October 12, 2016 @06:05PM (#12696782)
The hassle involves the latency of wanting to watch something and it being in the envelope in your home.
Re:Netflix Now Only Has 31 Movies from IMDB's Top 250 List by pmoriarty on Wednesday October 12, 2016 @06:23PM (#12696880)
I'd rather wait a bit for something good than stream garbage.
Re:Netflix Now Only Has 31 Movies from IMDB's Top 250 List by wtetzner on Thursday October 13, 2016 @11:10AM (#12701227)
> Streaming is definitely more convenient, but since Netflix's streaming selection is atrocious, it's not worth my time or money.

Which was exactly my point. It's a flaw of Netflix that it's streaming collection isn't as good as it's DVD collection.

Re:Netflix Now Only Has 31 Movies from IMDB's Top 250 List by maverick_iceman on Wednesday October 12, 2016 @11:24PM (#12698223)
I'm pretty sure hackney cab drivers argued similarly about automobiles.
Re:Netflix Now Only Has 31 Movies from IMDB's Top 250 List by caleblloyd on Wednesday October 12, 2016 @06:31PM (#12696921)
I used to love going to blockbuster to rent a flick, because I could do it on a whim (near-instant gratification). Because of streaming services like Netflix, blockbuster went out of business.

I don't plan for movie night days in advance. I'm not going to rent that shit in the mail. So after a few years of not touching my DVD player, I threw it out.

The content owners are the real ones losing out here. I'd pay $4 to stream any movie, there's just no service I'm aware of that offers them all digitally at that price.

Re:Netflix Now Only Has 31 Movies from IMDB's Top 250 List by erikjsanders on Tuesday October 18, 2016 @02:02AM (#12732448)
You can rent and stream many movies from Amazon for 3.99 SD and 4.99 HD. I'm not sure if these prices are discounted since I am a prime member.

I just recently started using VidAngel though, and I'm happy with it so far. They advertise being able to filter movies, but you can always just filter a single word if you don't want anything filtered. It's $1 for SD and $2 for HD. They have an interesting licensing model though so you sort of have to have a constant $18-$19 deposit with them.

Re:Netflix Now Only Has 31 Movies from IMDB's Top 250 List by gozur88 on Wednesday October 12, 2016 @07:40PM (#12697283)
Isn't that about what the cable PPV channels charge? Or am I out of date?
Re:Netflix Now Only Has 31 Movies from IMDB's Top 250 List by auno on Thursday October 13, 2016 @09:54AM (#12700752)
Then you'd have to get cable first, with whatever that entails. I don't have any kind of TV connection to my apartment at all.