News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:State of the OpenVMS Port to x86_64 [pdf] by dekhn on Wednesday October 12, 2016 @11:53AM (#12693953)
ugh. i switched from vms to unix in '88 because the telnet in vms was crappy. other than the wonderful help system, I never found VMS attractive.
Re:State of the OpenVMS Port to x86_64 [pdf] by gaius on Wednesday October 12, 2016 @12:24PM (#12694238)
VMScluster still blows away anything else. 20 years ago it was doing what you can only now do with vMotion now... And being able to set a working set per job... And a coherent story for cross-language libraries... I could go on. VMS was a technological tour de force that has yet to be rivalled.
Re:State of the OpenVMS Port to x86_64 [pdf] by dekhn on Wednesday October 12, 2016 @02:12PM (#12695226)
What cluster features were in VMScluster that weren't also in TruCluster? To me the interesting part of TruCluster was the shared filesystem and the application failover. That said, I work for a company now that eschews that kind of tight coupling, because it's expensive to scale the hardware.