News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Netflix Now Only Has 31 Movies from IMDB's Top 250 List. Parent comment

Re:Netflix Now Only Has 31 Movies from IMDB's Top 250 List by mikeash on Wednesday October 12, 2016 @10:22AM (#12693068)
That is why the analogy is wrong. If you're in a situation where you're definitely not going to buy it (because nobody will take your money and give you the product, for example) then there's no difference to them if you watch it or not.

Imagine I really want your car, so I take it. Or imagine I really want your car, so I use a magic wand to make an exact duplicate of it. Are those two scenarios at all comparable?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Netflix Now Only Has 31 Movies from IMDB's Top 250 List by sosborn on Wednesday October 12, 2016 @01:19PM (#12694773)
> (because nobody will take your money and give you the product, for example)

This argument fall apart in many of the examples cited in this thread because most of the time, those movies are available digitally for a price. The fact is that most people just don't want to pay that price so they use other means to watch the movie.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Netflix Now Only Has 31 Movies from IMDB's Top 250 List by mikeash on Wednesday October 12, 2016 @01:24PM (#12694820)
The argument works equally well if you simply wouldn't buy it.

The issue, of course, is whether or not you're correctly estimating whether you would end up buying it if you didn't pirate it. But if you take it as given that you wouldn't buy it, then there's no loss.

[ Parent | on HN ]