News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Standing-only escalators can carry up to 30 per cent more... by smegel on Wednesday October 12, 2016 @06:26AM (#12691670)
Don't they turn standing room only when it gets super busy anyway? And when it's not busy...who cares.
Re:Standing-only escalators can carry up to 30 per cent more... by lmm on Wednesday October 12, 2016 @07:49AM (#12692013)
At some busy stations (e.g. Canary Wharf during the morning rush hour) you'll find a big cluster of people at the bottom waiting for the standing side while there's space on the walking side. Obv. it gets dangerous if a trainload of people can't leave the station before the next trainload arrives. (Or more cynically, if they can achieve the same throughput with fewer escalators they'll save money on escalators).
Re:Standing-only escalators can carry up to 30 per cent more... by swearfu on Wednesday October 12, 2016 @10:41AM (#12693262)
Yeah, but it's only dangerous because those people choose to stand there waiting instead of using their legs. It's their choice to be lazy and those create a danger for everyone else. We need to stop rewarding people who can't do anything for themselves.
Re:Standing-only escalators can carry up to 30 per cent more... by lmm on Wednesday October 12, 2016 @12:05PM (#12694062)
True laziness would be not building more escalators were they're needed. Basic safety isn't "rewarding" people.