News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:You might not need JavaScript by inian on Wednesday October 12, 2016 @03:54AM (#12691059)
The you don't need jQuery website had a concrete use case - you need not include an entire library into your website for some simple tasks which makes your website faster.

Though, this site is cool in showing the power of CSS, I am not sure if there is any specific advantage of using CSS over JS to design tabs, sliders, etc. Just use the best tool for the job!

Re:You might not need JavaScript by kelseydh on Wednesday October 12, 2016 @05:37AM (#12691502)
The Tor web browser disables most (if not all?) Javascript by default as a security measure.

Avoiding Javascript is an advantage if you want your website to be accessible to Tor users.

If your website only handles basic things like form inputs and it breaks when Javascript is disabled, then you have not made it accessible.

Re:You might not need JavaScript by sotojuan on Wednesday October 12, 2016 @08:03AM (#12692068)
I think by now it's pretty safe to say most websites don't care about the tiny % of people using Tor or disabling JavaScript.
Re:You might not need JavaScript by couchand on Wednesday October 12, 2016 @08:56AM (#12692348)
That doesn't make it laudable, or even defensible.
Re:You might not need JavaScript by kek918 on Thursday October 13, 2016 @07:42AM (#12700002)
From a commercial point of view it kind of does. If the development costs exceeds the increased revenue it's not really worth it.
Re:You might not need JavaScript by yellowapple on Wednesday October 12, 2016 @06:38AM (#12691731)
There's definitely some merit to not requiring users to download and run arbitrary and untrusted Turing-complete code. Whether abusing a stylesheet language to achieve that is worth said merit is certainly debatable, but I for one applaud the effort.
Re:You might not need JavaScript by zerognowl on Wednesday October 12, 2016 @06:30AM (#12691693)