News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple Responds to Dash Controversy by logicallee on Tuesday October 11, 2016 @04:33AM (#12682603)
You write "for relatives and friends", implying a measure of trust. You don't write "for strangers I didn't know." Would you have?
Re:Apple Responds to Dash Controversy by protomyth on Tuesday October 11, 2016 @08:14AM (#12683606)
From his response "helped a relative get started by paying for her Apple’s Developer Program Membership using my credit card. I also handed her test hard"

It was a relative, so I don't get your question's relevance to the situation.

Re:Apple Responds to Dash Controversy by logicallee on Tuesday October 11, 2016 @08:51AM (#12683869)
sorry, I missed that part. I straight-up don't believe that their relative engaged in fraudulent activity related to Dash (such as leaving negative reviews of competitors) by complete coincidence and at arm's length. I didn't read all the information carefully though.
Re:Apple Responds to Dash Controversy by protomyth on Tuesday October 11, 2016 @10:59AM (#12684963)
> I straight-up don't believe that their relative engaged in fraudulent activity related to Dash (such as leaving negative reviews of competitors) by complete coincidence and at arm's length

You might want to read the rest, the relative was boosting their own apps. Dash was not part of scenario just affected by the end result.