News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Neo4j REST Server - Part1: Get it going by mark_l_watson on Thursday April 15, 2010 @10:59AM (#1267948)
A cool addition to a very useful project. That said, I prefer using JRuby and Neo4j in embedded mode: the Ruby bindings are very good.
Re:The Neo4j REST Server - Part1: Get it going by toddstavish on Thursday April 15, 2010 @10:26AM (#1267857)
Awesome. I had to build this myself! Nice to see it as a feature now.
Re:The Neo4j REST Server - Part1: Get it going by MartinMond on Thursday April 15, 2010 @10:17AM (#1267833)
So does that mean Neo4J can now be used in closed source projects?
Re:The Neo4j REST Server - Part1: Get it going by mark_l_watson on Thursday April 15, 2010 @11:01AM (#1267955)
I don't think so. If the REST server is part of a larger system then I believe that the AGPL requires that the other networked software components need to be AGPLed.

They do have a commercial license (I think that they charge $1K for a 1-server perpetual commercial non-AGPL license).

Re:The Neo4j REST Server - Part1: Get it going by al_james on Thursday April 15, 2010 @12:31PM (#1268185)
How about if the Neo4J REST component was (say) one of a few options (the others being something like FlockDB or a mysql implementation)... In effect you would need to bring your own Neo4J platform to use the larger sytem, and Neo4J would not be a core component of it.
Re:The Neo4j REST Server - Part1: Get it going by mark_l_watson on Thursday April 15, 2010 @01:48PM (#1268392)
Good point, but I am not sure. The key thing is to respect the wishes of the authors of a package so I would just contact the Neo4j developers and ask them.
Re:The Neo4j REST Server - Part1: Get it going by al_james on Thursday April 15, 2010 @02:38PM (#1268550)
I have posted on their mailing list.

However, I guess that if you dont distribute a copy of the Neo4J package with your code, they basically have no say?