Re:Web2Web: Serverless Websites Powered by Torrents and Bitcoin
by akerro on Monday October 10, 2016 @11:31AM
(#12677625)
> Why in the heck would you want a webpage to be 100mb+ ?!
Websites have scripts, images, videos, ads, text. Image + thumbnail = 1MB, gallery of images = 15MB, 600 posts with images, thumbnails, comments with avatars = ... ?
My wordpress blog started in 2010 with images, thumbnails is 5GB, last time I checked in July.
Re:Web2Web: Serverless Websites Powered by Torrents and Bitcoin
by ClassyJacket on Monday October 10, 2016 @12:53PM
(#12678275)
But 100MB per page is ridiculous, expect for embedded videos. I'd be waiting two minutes for each page to load.
Re:Web2Web: Serverless Websites Powered by Torrents and Bitcoin
by haggy on Monday October 10, 2016 @03:21PM
(#12679211)
Also keep in mind that this isn't a traditional Request/Response model. Much (if not all) of a "website" must be downloaded up front via the torrent network, and then run locally. 100MB per request on a traditional site is ridiculous but 100MB for downloading 1 very large web app from the torrent network is not so crazy.
Re:Web2Web: Serverless Websites Powered by Torrents and Bitcoin
by akerro on Monday October 10, 2016 @03:10PM
(#12679132)
In the top comment by webpage I meant a blog. I wanted to publish my blog on zeroNet, but I can do it only when I remove all images, which misses the point of my blog.
Re:Web2Web: Serverless Websites Powered by Torrents and Bitcoin
by ayyn0n0n0 on Thursday October 13, 2016 @04:17PM
(#12703698)
>600 posts with images, thumbnails, comments with avatars =
This is not all on ONE page
>My wordpress blog started in 2010 with images, thumbnails is 5GB, last time I checked in July.
Again, that is the size of your database, not webpage.
Re:Web2Web: Serverless Websites Powered by Torrents and Bitcoin
by bruno2223 on Monday October 10, 2016 @11:28AM
(#12677594)
+1
Re:Web2Web: Serverless Websites Powered by Torrents and Bitcoin
by quirkafleeg on Monday October 10, 2016 @02:44PM
(#12679009)
There's an up arrow next to usernames.
I wouldn't say that is a weakness, you want your webpages to be as small as possible.