It's even more pronounced with Russia and China (and nowadays Turkey, with Hungarian aspirations to join the club): Fiercely capitalistic economies* in an almost complete absence of other civil liberties.
For NK, I doubt that a comparison makes any sense, considering how far removed it is from other countries' societies. How do you account for widespread forced labor? What's the real value of any income they get if part of it is in quotas for food, and most prices are subject to change at a moments notice when PJ thinks it's a good idea or toilet paper reserves are running dry?
*as long as it doesn't come into contact with political realm, and sometimes obscured by an additional kleptocratic layer.
Since the state controlled most of the means of generating capital and manufacturing (and hence profited directly from any goods they produced), direct taxation was unnecessary direct taxes were less than 10% of the government revenue of the USSR and most other soviet/communist states.
There were high taxes levied on some imports, as well as on foreign corporations there were also often export taxes on goods that were set for export that were not directly produced by state owned enterprises.