News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fossil: A decentralized version control, bug tracking, an... by yitchelle on Sunday October 09, 2016 @05:58PM (#12673745)
> with ungodly marketing

Was the the marketing of git basically due to the fact that Linus created it?

Re:Fossil: A decentralized version control, bug tracking, an... by adambrenecki on Sunday October 09, 2016 @07:10PM (#12674073)
I think it had more to do with GitHub than anything else. In GitHub's early days, they put a lot of effort into marketing Git (e.g. the now defunct "Git Is Better Than X" website), because they needed people to use it in order to use GitHub.
Re:Fossil: A decentralized version control, bug tracking, an... by antod on Monday October 10, 2016 @08:27PM (#12680995)
I reckon it was a combination of Github and Rails being early adopters at the peak growth of their hype cycle. In the early days of Github it seemed like most of the projects there were Ruby based (Rails users overflowing).
Re:Fossil: A decentralized version control, bug tracking, an... by JoshTriplett on Sunday October 09, 2016 @06:06PM (#12673796)
Developer word-of-mouth in general, combined with the massive network effects of a version control system. Once you use a VCS because software you work on uses it, if you want to start your own project, you tend to use what you know.
Re:Fossil: A decentralized version control, bug tracking, an... by wangchow on Sunday October 09, 2016 @06:25PM (#12673902)
Git was designed for the Linux kernel source which everyone using android or another Linux distro is interested in. That helps a lot because if it can handle that project surely it can handle any other codebase.
Re:Fossil: A decentralized version control, bug tracking, an... by solipsism on Sunday October 09, 2016 @06:57PM (#12674033)
Not any other codebase. Codebases with huge and often-changing binaries (e.g. images or 3d models), for example, were troublesome for git, at least historically. The Linux kernel isn't big in all ways.