Hugo: A fast and modern static website engine

Re:Hugo: A fast and modern static website engine by nzjrs on Sunday October 09, 2016 @05:22PM (#12673552)

Is it modern because it's written in Go, or am I missing something?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Hugo: A fast and modern static website engine by coldtea on Sunday October 09, 2016 @05:34PM (#12673612)

It is modern because it's not based on some 20 year old unmaintained Perl CGI script.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Hugo: A fast and modern static website engine by shincert on Sunday October 09, 2016 @07:44PM (#12674191)

Which static site generator is based on a 20 year old unmaintained Perl CGI script?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Hugo: A fast and modern static website engine by devonkim on Sunday October 09, 2016 @11:55PM (#12674937)

I used to use Blosxom for a while and found the Jekyll workflow somewhat comparable.

[ Parent | on HN ]