News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:San Jose: New law would make city first to allow “tiny ho... by gok on Sunday October 09, 2016 @11:44AM (#12671686)
Americans complain about taxes more than perhaps any other people from a rich nation, but we frankly don't pay that much. The OECD average is about 35% of GDP. The UK pays right about that. The US pays ~27% of GDP. And of course even with that relatively small amount of revenue, a lot of it goes to uniquely American spending schemes like defense or NASA, both of which are vastly better funded than their European equivalents. So it's really not all that surprising that lots of other stuff doesn't get funded much.

That being said, the homeless rate in England and the United States is the same ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_homeless_... ). Do you see a similar resistance to supporting people there?

Re:San Jose: New law would make city first to allow “tiny ho... by ralusek on Sunday October 09, 2016 @12:34PM (#12671928)
Percentage of GDP sounds like an insane way to measure tax rate for individuals.
Re:San Jose: New law would make city first to allow “tiny ho... by gok on Sunday October 09, 2016 @01:48PM (#12672316)
If you look at individual tax rates the United States is an even bigger outlier. No VAT, and income tax is extremely progressive.
Re:San Jose: New law would make city first to allow “tiny ho... by imh on Sunday October 09, 2016 @12:30PM (#12671900)
Does that include state taxes?
Re:San Jose: New law would make city first to allow “tiny ho... by hackermailman on Sunday October 09, 2016 @12:59PM (#12672041)
And city property tax where the majority of all homeless housing initiatives are funded from, even though homelessness is really a national problem as they migrate to the cities with the best weather and benefits, further straining individual city resources like San Jose.
Re:San Jose: New law would make city first to allow “tiny ho... by gok on Sunday October 09, 2016 @01:38PM (#12672257)
Yes.