You responded to a strawman of what I said, made no points that even remotely address or refute what I said, and further, decided that you were going to personally attack me. In fact, your link generally agreed with my point! (In summary: traditional reading and lecture methods have benefits; videos and other newer media can help (some) people, and give a new perspective; computers have a few useful behaviors; engaging imagination and exploration are better than rote learning.)

That's really kind of pathetic, and a disservice to your view.

I'd be happy to speak with you, though, if you want to actually read my comment and address a (charitable) interpretation of what I said, rather than your strawman one.