News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Refusal to recognize the rise of independent contractors is hurting the economy. Parent comment

Re:Refusal to recognize the rise of independent contractors ... by ajmurmann on Saturday October 08, 2016 @02:18PM (#12667958)
John Cochrane made the best statement about this I've heard so far on Econtalk a few weeks ago: http://www.econtalk.org/archives/2016/09/john_cochrane_o.htm...

His point is that it's not about the quantity of regulation, but the type of regulation. In short he sees two types: 1. Regulation that I can read and now I know what to do and not do. 2. Regulation that requires me to consult an expert and apply to some government agency who then tells me if I am allowed to do something or not.

Obviously the second type is the bad one. You cannot properly plan. There often is no guaranteed time frame, you have no proper recourse and ideally have some kind of fixer. This type of regulation also tends to give large businesses an edge over small ones, creates large overhead for the system as a whole and ultimately hurts innovation.

I think it would help any discussion about regulation to carefully differentiate between these two types of regulation.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Refusal to recognize the rise of independent contractors ... by crazy1van on Saturday October 08, 2016 @05:18PM (#12668775)
Econtalk ( http://www.econtalk.org ) is an amazing resource for understanding economics and the theories and incentives at play within it. The guests have a wide array of perspectives and the host does a good job of letting them talk so they can truly express their opinions during the hour conversation. It's so refreshing compared to the 2 minute soundbite theatrics you'll hear from "experts" on the tv news.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Refusal to recognize the rise of independent contractors ... by jomamaxx on Saturday October 08, 2016 @06:21PM (#12668988)
Masses of regulations are complex and require lawyers - even small business tax is a mess.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Refusal to recognize the rise of independent contractors ... by ajmurmann on Saturday October 08, 2016 @07:07PM (#12669126)
He makes a ton of suggestions on how to simplify regulations. Among other things he wants to do taxing corporations altogether because according to him they eithe avoid them or pass them on anyways.

Listen to it! You will enjoy it!

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Refusal to recognize the rise of independent contractors ... by danieltillett on Saturday October 08, 2016 @08:53PM (#12669377)
The problem with not taxing corporations is the rich can use corporations as a tax free saving vehicle.

There is a great need to simplify regulations, but until the political system is reformed it will be hard to prevent the political class conspiring with vested interests to create regulations. Fix the cause not the symptoms.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Refusal to recognize the rise of independent contractors ... by coredog64 on Saturday October 08, 2016 @11:25PM (#12669745)
> The problem with not taxing corporations is the rich can use corporations as a tax free saving vehicle.

I think this is more myth than reality. The IRS has a very good nose for finding people who are attempting this particular tax avoidance strategy.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Refusal to recognize the rise of independent contractors ... by danieltillett on Sunday October 09, 2016 @12:23AM (#12669885)
Yes they do now, but if you stopped taxing corporations then it would be a lot harder.

The system we use in Australia is quite good. Corporations pay income tax, but any tax paid is passed onto the shareholders in the form of a tax credit (franking credits).

[ Parent | on HN ]