In other words, it is completely unrelated, and your overcharging on drugs was awful and again, completely unrelated to this core issue.
I wasn't over-charged for drugs, I was over-prescribed by the doctor - and this shows the danger of being given drugs you're not supposed to have (both wasted money and loss of treatment time). Which was the point of the last two paragraphs in support of my claim that mislabeling is worse than pharma companies over-charging insurance companies (I believe non-insurance holders were offered lower prices by Mylan?). But I could see how my choice of phrasing might have been misinterpreted.
If they aren't competent enough for their high-stakes job they should be doing something else where their fallibility isn't harming peoples lives. And the inaccurate over-prescribing and was only part of my negative experience with the physician in question.
It's like a game of musical chairs for who gets to pay the government a billion dollars this year.
This Epipen case sounds far less bad then most on that list. Especially if we're going to talk about punishment. As most of the other settlements on the list were for mislabeled drugs. People were spending money and wasted weeks/months of their supposed treatment on drugs that didn't help them.
I personally experienced the effects of this due to a bad doctor, not mislabeling, and I was seriously sick for a much longer period of time then I should have been. Fortunately I found a specialist who knew what he was talking about and told me to take one drug which cost $100/m instead of three others costing me $900/m (I didn't have drug benefits insurance at the time). For me the wasted time on a treatment that didn't work was far more harmful to me than the added cost.