Re:Keegan – Personal photo coach
by bambax on Friday October 07, 2016 @03:34PM
(#12663360)
Here I played with colors and color temp on a post-sunset landscape, and the resulting image, while really not great --in fact, plain weird-- is rated 9.3
Does the system have a notion of how sure it is of the rating it gives? [Edit: should it say "without a doubt"? There should be some doubt.]
(Also, is it deterministic (same image always get the same rating); it sure appears to be and it's certainly what people expect of a bot, but that's not how humans rate things...)
Re:Keegan – Personal photo coach
by daenney on Friday October 07, 2016 @04:01PM
(#12663520)
To be honest, I kinda like the image. It might not be great to you but it has a nice spooky fantasy air to it to me. As to wether it should be considered a good picture, I have no idea.
https://keegan.regaind.io/p/04t9ZlbZRDqbc2mPx-4CvA
Does the system have a notion of how sure it is of the rating it gives? [Edit: should it say "without a doubt"? There should be some doubt.]
(Also, is it deterministic (same image always get the same rating); it sure appears to be and it's certainly what people expect of a bot, but that's not how humans rate things...)